UPDATE: Egyptian officials are now distancing themselves from earlier reports that Mohamed ElBaradei will be Egypt’s next prime minister — that doesn’t incredibly change the analysis, though. ElBaradei’s ties to the West, not to mention the other drawbacks mentioned below, help us understand why Egypt’s new military-backed government may have had second thoughts about ElBaradei, especially if they are hoping to bring Salafist Al-Nour Party leaders into the fold.
* * * *
Mohamed ElBaradei is set to become Egypt’s interim prime minister just four days after Mohammed Morsi was deposed as from the Egyptian presidency by the country’s armed forces.
ElBaradei, the former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is a well-known figure whose international credibility runs far deeper than that of newly-installed interim president Adly Mansour, formerly the chief justice of the Egyptian constitutional court. His selection as prime minister will bring instant gravitas to the emerging post-Morsi regime in Egypt, at least vis-à-vis the rest of the world.
But deploying ElBaradei into power is not risk-free — for either the new government or for ElBaradei’s reputation.
The danger is that his selection won’t be enough to ameliorate the governance crisis that has now accelerated with the Egyptian military’s decision to remove Morsi. After all, though Morsi’s government had few allies after its troubled year in office, it’s hard to believe that the Muslim Brotherhood still doesn’t command the largest bloc of supporters within Egypt, and their wrath at the military’s turn against the Muslim Brotherhood may not be soothed by the appointment of any caretaker, no matter his seniority or even-handedness. ElBaradei’s appointment comes just a day after pro-Morsi supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood staged a day of protest — the ‘Friday of rejection’ — demanding the return of Morsi to the presidency that met with tense, sometimes violent, resistance from the Egyptian military. It’s too early to predict that Egypt is descending into a kind of civil war — despite a troubling lynching of four Shi’a Muslims last month, the largely Sunni Egypt doesn’t really feature strong Sunni-Shi’a schisms that have propelled sectarian violence more recently in countries like Iraq and Syria, and most Egyptians, even its more conservative Islamists, hold the military in high regard, for now at least. But there’s no guarantee that ElBaradei can keep political violence from spiraling further out of control, propelling ever more turmoil to Egyptian industry, trade and tourism.
Even if no one will miss the ineptitude of the Morsi government, ElBaradei’s new power doesn’t come imbued with much of a mandate. Though Egypt’s post-Mubarak transition was troubled from its inception, the successful conduct of free and fair presidential elections last summer was a key milestone on Egypt’s road toward a more democratic state. While it’s true that the anti-Morsi protests had ballooned to a size even larger than those against Mubarak in February 2011, the more relevant factor is that Mubarak was never elected in a free election the way that Morsi was only a year ago. So while political scientists debate whether last week’s events amounted to a coup (spoiler: yes, of course it was a coup, even if the U.S. administration doesn’t use the word ‘coup’), ElBaradei and his military supporters will come to power having undermined the most visible democratic credential that Egyptians could boast since the Arab Spring began.
By contrast, though French president François Hollande remains incredibly unpopular after just one year into a five-year term, no one seriously thinks the French military is set to remove him from office to install a center-right president in France. Moreover, ElBaradei will become Egypt’s new leader after having pulled out of last year’s presidential race, and it was not entirely clear that ElBaradei would have won in any event. But it would have been better for the country today if ElBaradei had remained in the race to make a full-throated case for a secular, liberal democratic Egypt and to bring the fight to Morsi on the basis of the merits of his own ideas, not on the coattails of the military’s guns.
Unlike former foreign minister and Arab Council secretary-general Amr Moussa and former air force chief Ahmed Shafiq, ElBaradei is not tainted as felool – the ‘remnants’ of the government that Hosni Mubarak led from the 1980s until 2011. But as the Tamarod (‘Rebellion’) movement has gathered steam in its efforts to oust Morsi, ElBaradei has managed to unite a disparate coalition of anti-Morsi interests, including Moussa, much of the former military establishment, elements of the so-called ‘deep state’ and supporters of former presidential candidate Hamdeen Sabahi, whose leftist, Nasser-style nationalism nearly vaulted him into last June’s presidential runoff. If Monsour, ElBaradei and the new interim government succeed in organizing a new presidential election, Sabahi would certainly be the frontrunner to win it (unless ElBaradei himself runs, though he’s said he’s not interested in the presidency for himself).
As ElBaradei has noted in the days leading up to and following Morsi’s forced removal, the Morsi presidency was far from perfect — ElBaradei had routinely accused Morsi of becoming a ‘pharaoh’ in office, and he mocked Morsi’s Islamist agenda by noting acidly that ‘you can’t eat sharia.’ Though Morsi won only a narrow victory last June over Shafiq, he triumphed by assembling a broader coalition that transcended his own Muslim Brotherhood supporters, and, in recognition of that reality, Morsi initially called for a broad inclusion of diverse views in formulating policies in office. One of his first steps in August 2012, in firing longtime army chief and defense minister Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, and replacing him with Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi, was an incredibly successful masterstroke, temporarily at least, in marrying the political interests of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian military. Ironically, it was El-Sisi, who owed his position as commander-in-chief of the Egyptian armed forces to Morsi, who green-lighted the action that toppled Morsi.
But as Bassem Sabry explained in illuminating detail on Thursday in Al-Monitor, the clear point at which Morsi lost control over the country was his ill-fated decision last November to push through a vote on the country’s new constitution.
Though the constitution’s provisions proved incredibly controversial among liberal, reformist and secular opponents of the Morsi administration, the manner in which Morsi and his Islamist allies pushed through the constitution itself was even more objectionable. His heavy-handed effort to impose a final constitution for Egypt warped what should have been a highly collaborative and symbolic process marking the final transition from the era of authoritarian rule under Mubarak and the interim Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) to a liberal, if Islam-influenced, democracy. Morsi’s ridiculous attempt to assert extraordinary powers to push through the constitution, though ultimately rebuffed by Egypt’s judiciary, galvanized his opponents in a coalition of unity. ElBaradei brought together the competing liberal and reformist groups under the banner of the National Salvation Front in December 2012, and you can draw a line almost immediately from that moment to Morsi’s last days in office. Yet now that ElBaradei and the anti-Morsi opposition seem set to take power, however, it may be difficult to maintain that unity, which doesn’t bode well for ElBaradei’s success in the long run.
Even since the showdown over Egypt’s constitution at the end of 2012, however, Morsi had done little to mark any progress on constitutional or social liberties — a year after Morsi had pledged to appoint both a woman and a Christian as his vice presidents, his administration has pushed through no significant reforms to make Egypt a broad-based, liberal democracy. Instead of organizing a return to elected provincial governors as promised, Morsi’s government appointed key Brotherhood figures as provincial administrators earlier in June, including Adel Asaad al-Khayyat as his first choice for governor of Luxor, despite Addad al-Khayyat’s ties to groups that launched terrorist attacks on tourist groups in a province most well-known as the site of the Great Pyramids. In March, Morsi undermined press freedom by launching a legal investigation into Bassem Youssef, a popular comedian, whose arrest by the Morsi administration only made him more popular.
Perhaps most critically, Morsi’s administration wholly failed to combat the growing economic mess that itself was already a major catalyst for the February 2011 Tahrir Square protests that forced Mubarak from office. Morsi’s appointment of Al-Mursi Al-Sayed Hegazy, an economist with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, in January 2013 as Egypt’s new finance minister did little to help bring international investment to the Egyptian economy. But no one could have expected any administration to transform the Egyptian economy in 12 months and it’s not incredibly clear that ElBaradei or his secular allies have a better plan to revive the economy or that ElBaradei will command unity among his allies to execute a new economic direction, especially with global investors wringing their hands over Egypt’s political mess and with key U.S. figures calling for a suspension of U.S. financial aid to Egypt.
A series of legislative elections scheduled earlier this spring — what would have been the third effort since the initial 2011 revolution to elect an Egyptian parliament — were cancelled amid fears that Morsi was stacking the deck in favor of his allies, and ElBaradei and the National Salvation Front were already boycotting the elections when Egypt’s constitutional court ruled that the scheduled elections were unconstitutional. Even if ElBaradei’s new government drafts a new constitution or new constitutional amendments, organizes new presidential and parliamentary elections, and holds them in a way that allows all parties — including the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party — to contest them in an open and fair manner, there’s no real indication that ElBaradei and the National Salvation Front would win. It might result in the election of an even more Islamist government, especially if disaffected Brotherhood supporters turn to the Salafist al-Nour Party.
El-Sisi and other Egyptian military leaders, in their own right, would also be well advised to look with caution toward the old Turkish model of halfway-house democracy where secularism comes ‘guaranteed’ by an entrenched military elite — protestors in Taksim Square may not be happy with Islamist prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, but they are certainly not nostalgic for the civil rights restrictions and sometimes violent abuses of the 20th century Kemalist system.
So though ElBaradei’s appointment will be met, especially throughout Washington, Brussels and a good many Middle Eastern capitals with some relief, there’s no reason to be incredibly sanguine that this will be the final ‘reset’ that Egypt needs in order to move to more pressing policy and governance matters.
Filed under: Egypt Tagged: | al-nour party, amr moussa, arab spring, coup, egypt, egyptian military, el-sisi, elbaradei, erdogan, Hollande, islamist, kemalist, mansour, morsi, mubarak, muslim brotherhood, national salvation front, salafist, SCAF, shafiq, tantawi, turkey, United States