A tale of two referenda: How the EU debate could poison the Scotland debate

farageflees

In a static world, it’s easy to believe that UK prime minister David Cameron’s call in January 2013 for a referendum on the United Kingdom’s continued membership in the European Union will never come to pass — it depends upon the reelection of a Conservative-led in the 2015 general election, Cameron’s continued Tory leadership and a lengthy process of negotiation thereafter with EU leaders. United Kingdom Flag Iconscotland

So when Cameron agreed with Scottish first minister Alex Salmond two months later to hold a referendum on Scottish independence in September 2014, he had every reason to believe that he had bought enough time to keep the European issue relatively calm.  After all, poll after poll shows the pro-independence vote lagging far behind the anti-independence vote and, despite a relatively large number of undecided Scottish voters, many polls throughout 2012 and early 2013 showed the ‘no’ vote with over 50% support.  One Ipsos poll earlier this month showed that 59% support union and just 31% support independence.

But what’s increasingly clear is that the two referenda are becoming inseparable — Scotland’s future role in the United Kingdom depends on the United Kingdom’s future role in Europe.  With Westminster now increasingly turning to its toxic obsession with its union with Europe, a group of largely English parliamentarians may well be endangering the more longstanding three-century union with Scotland.

It’s easy to follow Cameron’s arithmetic here:  Allow the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and the more euroskeptic members of his own party their opportunity for an anti-Europe outlet in the May 2014 European Parliament elections.  Then sail through the September 2014 Scottish referendum with both the Labour Party and the Liberal Democratic Party united against Scottish independence, maybe even by promising ‘devomax,’ a form of further devolution of tax and spending powers to the Scottish parliament that came into existence in 1999.  Cameron could therefore put the specter of Scottish independence behind him before looking to the next general election and, if successfully reelected, the EU negotiations that would precede the long-promised EU referendum.

What Cameron didn’t count on was the growing chorus of euroskeptic rage from within his own party, which seems destined to repeat the Tory infighting of the 1990s that so destabilized former prime minister John Major’s government  Education minister Michael Gove’s insisted last week, for example, that he would support leaving the European Union if a vote were held immediately.  Over 100 Tory backbenchers are calling for a law to guarantee a referendum later this decade or even for a referendum before 2015, and one Tory MP is even arguing for a full joint Tory/UKIP electoral coalition in 2015.  Some Tories are even trying to look beyond Cameron to a more Euroskeptic leader, perhaps even Gove.  It comes at a time when UK voters insist in poll after poll that they would overwhelmingly vote to leave the European Union in a referendum.

UKIP’s rise hasn’t helped, and Nigel Farage’s insistence at contesting a Scottish by-election led to the somewhat humorous result of his being chased out of a pub in Edinburgh last week (pictured above).  Though it’s a safe bet that Farage and UKIP won’t make many inroads in Scotland, it’s hard to see how his active presence in Scotland could do anything but make things worse for unionist supporters.  His party is currently polling as much as 20% in national polls, outpacing the Liberal Democrats and, in some cases, pulling to within single digits of the Conservatives (giving Labour a sizable lead).  Even if Labour wins in 2015, if UKIP wins the support of one out of every five UK voters, it will pull not only the Tories, but probably even Labour, further toward euroskepticism and eventual rupture with Europe. 

It’s stunning that in a thoughtful (if opaque) editorial last week in The Telegraph outlining reasons for and against leaving the European Union, Conservative London mayor Boris Johnson didn’t even mention Scotland:

More generally, there is a risk that leaving the EU will be globally interpreted as a narrow, xenophobic, backward-looking thing to do…. There may be other good reasons for staying in, but I can’t think of them now.

It’s not surprising that right-wing euroskepticism is playing incredibly poorly in Scotland.  Scotland has been consistently further left than England in the past half-century, tilting ever more toward the Nordic social welfare model than to the free-market Anglo-American model.  That alone, however, might not be enough for voters to rupture over three centuries of union with England that, together, created a colonial empire that dominated the 19th century.  But despite its strong regional pride, Scotland has always been more pro-European than England — in a world where Scottish voters feel like they’re choosing between an isolated and insular England and being at the heart of Europe, it’s not so clear why they would choose England over Europe.

A new Panelbase poll for the Sunday Times and Real Radio Scotland shows that unionist sentiment may be dropping amid the growing chances that the United Kingdom could leave the European Union — 36% would support independence, 44% would oppose independence and 20% are uncertain.  When asked how they would vote if the United Kingdom did actually leave the European Union, both sides would receive 44% support, with just 12% undecided.  That’s about the best poll I’ve seen in two years for Scottish nationalists.  Meanwhile, Salmond leads a popular majority government in Scotland, and remains popular and, by far, the Scottish National Party leads Labour and the Liberal Democrats in polls for both future regional and UK elections.

Europe was always going to be at the heart of the Scottish case for independence.  It’s the presence of a robust supranational governance structure that, in large part, makes Scottish independence possible.  Although Scotland’s nationalists have pinned their hopes on North Sea oil revenue, it certainly helps that Scotland would remain part of a larger legal, economic, trade and migration union.  Though Scotland may require some negotiations upon independence to ‘rejoin’ the European Union, it would already have implemented the entirety of the acquis communautaire required for entry, so the negotiations would likely be fast-tracked or even folded into the process of separating from England.

Photo credit to SWNS.

One thought on “A tale of two referenda: How the EU debate could poison the Scotland debate”

  1. Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be exciting to read through content from other authors and use a little something from other sites. |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.